Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
Published: 2015-11-14

Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) dengan Assessment for Learning (Afl) Terhadap Prestasi Belajar dan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Pada Materi Segiempat ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa

IAIN Mataram
Pembelajaran Koperatif Think Pair Share Assessment for Learning Komunikasi Matematis Gaya Kognitif

Galleys

Abstract

This research aim to find out the effect of the learning models on achievement and mathematics communication ability viewed from cogn2itive style. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning of TPS type with AfL, cooperative learning of TPS type, and the direct learning mode. The research was quasi experimental. The population was all students of grade VII State Junior High School in Surakarta City. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways multivariat analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of TPS type with AfL gives better achievement and mathematics communication ability than the cooperative learning model of TPS type and the direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of TPS type gives better achievement and mathematics communication ability than the direct learning model. (2) Students with the FI cognitive style had better achievement than students with the FD cognitive style, while students with the FI cognitive style had the same mathematics communication ability as students with the FD cognitive style. (3) On FD cognitive style and FI cognitive style, the cooperative learning model of TPS type with AfL gives a better achievement than the cooperative learning model of TPS type and the direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of TPS type gives a better achievement than the direct learning model. (4) On the cooperative learning model of TPS type with AfL, the cooperative learning model of TPS type and the direct learning model, students with the FI cognitive style had better achievement than students with the FD cognitive style. On the cooperative learning model of TPS type with AfL, the cooperative learning model of TPS type and the direct learning model, students with the FI cognitive style and FD cognitive style had the same mathematics communication ability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad and Akhmad Jazuli. 2009. Jigsaw Type of Cooperative Learning as a
Means of Improving High School Students’ Mathematical Communication
Ability. International Journal for Educational Stude Teaching and
Learning in Higher Educational Studies. 1(2): 207-218.
Anwar Sukito Ardjo. 2008. Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran dan gaya Kognitif
terhadap Hasil Belajar Pemrograman Otomasi Gamabr Teknik. Jurnal
Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(1): 1-14.
Bowering, M., Britget, M.L., and Michael, H. 2007. “Opening up Thinking
Reflections on Group Work in a Bilingual Postgraduate Program”.
International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.
19(1): 77-83.
Budiyono. 2010. Peran Asessmen Dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran.
Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika,
Universitas Sebelas Maret, tanggal 5 Mei 2010.
Budiyono. 2011. Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Surakarta: Program Pascasarjana
Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Budiyono. 2013. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Surakarta: Program Pascasarjana
Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Bowering, M., Britget, M.L., and Michael, H. 2007. “Opening up Thinking
Reflections on Group Work in a Bilingual Postgraduate Program”.
International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.
19(1): 77-83.
Clements, D.H. and Battista, M.T.1992. Geometry and Spatial Reasonning. Dalam
Grouws, D.A. (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and
Learning (hlm. 420-464). New York: MacMillan Publisher Com-pany.
Guisande, M.A., Tinajero, C., Cadaveira, F., & Paramo, M.F. 2012. Attention and
Visuospatial Abilities: A Neurospsychological Approach in field_Dependent
and Field-Independent School Choldren. Studia Psychologica, 54(2): 83-94.
Harun dan Mansur. 2013. Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Bandung: CV. Wacana Prima.
Latta, M., Buck, G. & Beckenhauer, A. 2007. Formative Assessment Requires
Artistic Visions. International Journal of Education & the Arts. 8(4): 1-23.
Miftachul Anas. 2012. Eksperimen Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share (TPS) yang dimodifikasi penemuan terbimbing berbantuan Microsoft Power
Point pada pembelajaran Matematika Ditinjau dari Kedisiplinan Belajar
Siswa SMP Negeri Swasta Se-Kabupaten Ngawi Tahun Pelajaran
2012/2013. Tesis. Surakarta: Pascasarjana UNS.
Ofodu, G.O. & Raheem, A.L. 2011. “Cooperative Instructional Strategies and Performance Levels of Students in Reading Comprehension”. International Journal Education Science. 3(2): 103-107.
Riding, R. J., & Smith. E.S. 1997. Cognitive Style and Learning Strategies: Some
Implications for Trainiing Design. Interbational Journal of Training and
Development, Vol. 1(3), 199-208.
Tanwey Gerson Ratumanan. 2003. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Gaya
Kognitif terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa SLTP di Kota Ambon.
Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 5(1): 1-10.

How to Cite

Negara, H. R. P. (2015). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) dengan Assessment for Learning (Afl) Terhadap Prestasi Belajar dan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Pada Materi Segiempat ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 8(2), 163–182. Retrieved from https://jurnalbeta.ac.id/index.php/betaJTM/article/view/33