Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta
Allison, CW and Hayes, J. 1996. The Cognitive Style Index: A Measure of Intuition
Analysis For Organizational Research. Journal of Management Studies, 33
(1), Pp 119-135.
Altun. A. and Mehtap. C. 2006. Undergraduate Students’ Academic Achievement,
Field Dependent/Field Independent Cognitif Styles and Attitude toward
Computers. Journal Educational Technology and Society,Vol. 9, No. 1,
Bassey, Sam. W and Umoren, Grace. 2009. Cognitive Styles, Secondary School
Students‟ Attitude And Academic Performance In Chemistry In Akwa Ibom
Gurol, A. 2011. Determining The Reflective Thinking Skills of Pre-Service
Teachers In Learning and Teaching Process. Energy Education Science and
Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies. Volume (issue) 3 (3):
Hashim, Shahabuddin, dkk. 2011. Pedagogi-Strategi dan Teknik Mengajar
dengan Berkesan. Malaysia: PTS Professional Publishing.
Lee, HJ. 2005. Understanding and Assessing Preservice Teachers’ Reflective
Thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education . Vol 21 699–715.
Polya. 2004. How To Solve It. (Terjemahan John H. Conway). USE: Princeton
University Press. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 1973).
Suharna, Hery. 2012. Berfikir Reflektif Siswa (Reflective Thinking) Siswa SD
Berkemampuan Matematika Tinggi dalam Pemecahan Masalah Pecahan.
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika.
ISBN: 978-979-16353-8-7. Hal 378-386. Yogyakarta: FMIPA UNY.
Witkin. H. A., Oltman . P. K., Rasikin. E., and Karp. S. 1971. A Manual For The
Group Embeded Figure Test, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psycology Press.
- Abstract viewed - 1591 times
- PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded - 2943 times
© Beta Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 2015
STKIP PGRI Pacitan
How to Cite
Proses Berpikir Reflektif Mahasiswa Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Pada Materi Himpunan Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Berdasarkan Langkah Polya
Vol 8 No 2 (2015): Beta Nopember
Published: Nov 14, 2015
The purpose of this study is to describe the process of reflective thinking in solving the problem of mathematic education students on the material terms of the set viewed from cognitive styles. This research is classified in the qualitative descriptive study with the case study method. The subjects in this study were students of mathematic education STKIP PGRI Pacitan in the first semester of academic year 2014/2015. The determination of the subject is by using purposive sampling, which is based on field independent and field dependent of cognitive styles. The research data taken from the test results of subjects works and interviews of subjects. Test of the credibility of the data is done by time triangulation. The data analysis technique is qualitative descriptive by Miles and Huberman. The results showed that student with field independent cognitive styles more active using reflective thinking processes than student with field dependent cognitive styles.