Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika
Articles
DOI: 10.20414/betajtm.v16i2.503
Submitted: 2022-04-15
Published: 2023-11-30

The impact of online learning toward social skills of prospective teachers with different thinking styles

IAIN Ponorogo
IAIN Ponorogo
IAIN Ponorogo
Social skills Online learning Thinking styles Prospective teachers

Galleys

Abstract

[English]: This article discusses the impact of an online learning using Edmodo application on prospective teachers’ (PTs) social skills based on their thinking styles. A quasi-experimental research was used to examine the impact. Social skill and thinking style questonannires were administered to 100 PTs. The data were analysed using analyis of variances (Anova). The results show that PTs’ social skills with four thinking styles: concrete sequential (CS), abstract sequential (AS), concrete random (CR) and abstract random (AR) through the online learning are better than using a direct learning. Moreover, PTs’ social skills within each thinking style do not show any difference. However, in the direct learning, PTs’ social skills with abstract random thinking are better than PTs’ with abstract sequential.

[Bahasa]: Artikel ini membahas pengaruh model pembelajaran online dengan aplikasi Edmodo terhadap keterampilan sosial mahasiswa calon guru berdasarkan gaya berpikir. Penelitian kuantitatif dengan jenis eksperimen semu digunakan untuk menguji pengaruh tersebut. Pengumpulan data menggunakan angket yaitu angket keterampilan sosial dan angket karakteristik gaya berfikir yang diberikan kepada 100 calon guru. Uji Anova digunakan untuk menganalisis data. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa keterampilan sosial mahasiswa calon guru dengan empat gaya berpikir: sekuensial konkret (CS), sekuensial abstrak (AS), acak konkret (CR), dan acak abstrak (AR) yang menggunakan pembelajaran online edmodo lebih baik daripada pembelajaran langsung. Selain itu, keterampilan sosial mahasiswa calon guru pada masing-masing karakteristik gaya berpikir saat pembelajaran online tidak berbeda. Namun, pada pembelajaran langsung, keterampilan sosial calon guru dengan gaya berfikir acak abstrak lebih baik daripada sekuensial abstrak.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Albrahim, F. A. (2020). Online teaching skills and competencies. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 19(1), 9-20. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1239983
  2. Al-Kahtani, N., Almurayh, A., Subbarayalu, A. V., Sebastian, T., Alkahtani, H., & Aljabri, D. (2022). Sustaining blended and online learning during the normal and new normal conditions in a Saudi higher education institution: Health science students' perspectives. Heliyon, 8(10).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10898
  3. Agusta, A. R., & Pratiwi, D. A. (2021). Developing blended learning model Martapura to improve soft and social skills. In 4th Sriwijaya University Learning and Education International Conference (SULE-IC 2020) (pp. 294-302). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201230.121
  4. Ambarita, J., Jarwati, S. P. K., & Restanti, D. K. (2021). Pembelajaran luring. Penerbit Adab.
  5. Arifin, F., & Herman, T. (2018). Pengaruh pembelajarann e-learning model web centric course terhadap pemahaman konsep dan kemandirian belajar matematika siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22342/JPM.12.2.4152.1-12
  6. Arifin, M., & Ekayati, R. (2019). E-learning berbasis Edmodo. Deepublish.
  7. Ashpihani, M. (2016). Implementasi corona game engine pada game edukasi matematika sekolah dasar berbasis android (Doctoral dissertation, Sekolah Tinggi Informatika dan Komputer Indonesia, Malang).
  8. Asoodeh, M. H., Asoodeh, M. B., & Zarepour, M. (2012). The impact of student-centred learning on academic achievement and social skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 560-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.160
  9. Bali, M. M. E. I. (2017). Model interaksi sosial dalam mengelaborasi keterampilan sosial. Pedagogik: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.33650/pjp.v4i2.19
  10. Belousova, A. (2014). Thinking style as a factor of variable cognitive education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.167
  11. Ceylan, V. K., & Kesici, A. E. (2017). Effect of blended learning to academic achievement. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(1), 308-320. https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/4141
  12. Chen, B. (2020). Enhance creative performance via exposure to examples: The role of cognitive thinking style. Personality and Individual Differences, 154, 109663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109663
  13. Dangwal, K. L. (2017). Blended learning: An innovative approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050116
  14. De Porter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2000). Quantum learning. Mizan.
  15. Dinh, T. C., Dao, K. T., Quach, D. K., Ha, N. P. T., & Ho, M. C. (2021). Factors affect students’ satisfaction in blended learning courses in a private university in Vietnam. Essays in Education, 28(1), 2. https://openriver.winona.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1273&context=eie
  16. Empson, R. (30 April 2012). As it graduates from network to platform, Edmodo now serving 7m users, 80k schools. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2012/04/30/edmodo-hits-7m/
  17. Fauzi, M. N. (2018). The effect cooperative model type of SFE toward students social skills viewed from the thinking styles characteristics. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 6(2), 228-232. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i2.11875
  18. Fauziyah, S., & Triyono, M. B. (2020). Pengaruh e-learning Edmodo dengan model blended learning terhadap minat belajar. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 4(1), 112-124.https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v4i1.27562
  19. Ferris, G. R., Witt, L. A., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2001). Interaction of social skill and general mental ability on job performance and salary. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1075–1082.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1075
  20. Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105-125.https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00132
  21. Gamage, K. A., & Perera, E. (2021). Undergraduate students’ device preferences in the transition to online learning. Social Sciences, 10(8), 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10080288
  22. Goodwin, M. W. (1999). Cooperative learning and social skills: What skills to teach and how to teach them. intervention in school and clinic, 35(1), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129903500105
  23. Gottman, J. M., & Parker, J. G. (1986). Conversations of friends: Speculations on affective development. Cambridge University Press.
  24. Gregorc, A. F. (1998). The mind styles model: Theory, principles and practice: A primer. Gregorc Associates
  25. Gresham, F. M., Van Bao, M., & Cook, C. R. (2006). Social skills training for teaching replacement behaviors: Remediating acquisition deficits in at-risk students. Behavior Disorders, 31(4), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290603100402
  26. Gultom, N. C., Hasibuan, A., & Gultom, C. R. (2022). Komparasi efektivitas Edmodo dengan Google Classroom sebagai media PJJ dalam penugasan pelajaran bahasa indonesia. Asas: Jurnal Sastra, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.24114/ajs.v11i1.31844
  27. Hatip, A., & Listiana, Y. (2019). Minat, kemandirian dan hasil belajar mahasiswa pendidikan matematika dalam e-learning berbasis Edmodo. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v8i3.2261
  28. Hochwarter, W. A., Witt, L. A., Treadway, D. C., & Ferris, G. R. (2006). The interaction of social skill and organizational support on job performance. Journal of Psychology, 91(2), 482.https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.482
  29. Lam, Y. W., Hew, K. F., & Chiu, K. F. (2018). Improving argumentative writing: Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language learning & Technology, 22(1), 97-118. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44583
  30. Muijs, D., Reynolds, D., Soetjipto, H., & Soetjipto, S. (2008). Effective teaching: Teori dan aplikasi. Pustaka Pelajar.
  31. Noviyanti. F., & Sugiharta, I. (2019). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis: Dampak blended learning menggunakan Edmodo. Ejournal. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 2(2), 173–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/djm.v2i2.4035
  32. Øzerk, K., Özerk, G., & Silveira-Zaldivar, T. (2021). Developing social skills and social competence in children with autism. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(3), 341-363. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.195
  33. Pambuditama, T. (2010). Pengembangan media pembelajaarn berbasis e-learning untuk meningkatkan minat siswa terhadap matematika.https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:142921548
  34. Pertiwi, A., Kariadinata, R., Juariah, J., Sugilar, H., & Ramdhani, M. A. (2019). Edmodo-based blended learning on mathematical proving capability. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042001
  35. Pohan, A. E. (2020). Konsep pembelajaran daring berbasis pendekatan ilmiah. CV. Sarnu Untung.
  36. Putranti, N. (2016). Cara membuat media pembelajaarn online menggunakan Edmodo. Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains, 2(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.31571/Saintek.V2i2.224
  37. Rafiola, R., Setyosari, P., Radjah, C., & Ramli, M. (2020). The effect of learning motivation, self-efficacy, and blended learning on students’ achievement in the industrial revolution 4.0. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(8), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i08.12525
  38. Rahmy, S. N., Usodo, B., & Slamet, I. (2019). Students’ mathematics learning achievement in junior high school using 7E learning cycle. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1265(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1265/1/012014
  39. Retnoningsih, E. (2017). Perbandingan learning management system edmodo dan moodle dalam pembelajaran online. Information System for Educators and Professionals: Journal of Information System, 1(2), 221-230. https://doi.org/10.51211/isbi.v1i2.366
  40. Rositawati, D. (2019). Kajian berpikir kritis pada metode inkuiri. Prosiding SNFA (Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Aplikasinya), 3, 74-84. http://doi.org/10.20961/prosidingsnfa.v3i0.28514
  41. Sari, Y. I., & Trisnawati, N. (2021). Analisis pengaruh e-learning dan kesiapan belajar terhadap minat belajar melalui motivasi belajar sebagai variabel intervening mahasiswa program beasiswa FLATS di Surabaya pada masa pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 7(2), 346-360. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i2.3736
  42. Septanto, H. (2015). Elearning menggunakan edmodo sebuah aplikasi pembelajaran berbasis web. Bina Insani ICT Journal, 2(2), 121–141. http://ejournal-binainsani.ac.id/index.php/BIICT/article/view/793
  43. Shapiro, L. E. (2003). Mengajarkan emosional intellegence pada anak. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  44. She, R., han Mo, P. K., Li, J., Liu, X., Jiang, H., Chen, Y., Ma, L., & fai Lau, J. T. (2023). The double-edged sword effect of social networking use intensity on problematic social networking use among college students: The role of social skills and social anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, 107555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107555
  45. Suharti, S. (2021). Efektivitas penerapan media pembelajaran interaktif berbasis Edmodo dalam menyongsong era revolusi industri 4.0 terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 1025-1038. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i2.564
  46. Suprabha, K., & Subramonian, G. (2019). Effect of blended learning in developing social skills among higher secondary students. International Journal of Pedagogical Studies (IJPS), 7(1). http://agmcoe.ac.in/Document/ijps2019issue.pdf#page=8
  47. Tajik, F., & Vahedi, M. (2021). Quarantine and education: An assessment of Iranian formal education during the COVID-19 outbreak and school closures. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 17(1), 159-175. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1285530
  48. Tsetsos, S., & Prentzas, J. (2020). A survey on recent learning approaches in school education using Edmodo. In Open Educational Resources (OER) pedagogy and practices (pp. 91–111). https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/a-survey-on-recent-learning-approaches-in-school-education-using-edmodo/243308
  49. Wentzel, K. (2017). Peer relationships, motivation, and academic performance at school. Handbook of competence and motivation, 279-296. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-17591-031
  50. Widyaningrum, H. K., Hasanudin, C., Fitrianingsih, A., Novianti, D. E., Saddhono, K., & Supratmi, N. (2020). The use of Edmodo apps in flipped classroom learning. How is the students’ creative thinking ability? Ingenierie Des Systemes d’Information, 25(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.250109
  51. Zhang, L. F. (2004). Thinking styles: University students' preferred teaching styles and their conceptions of effective teachers. The Journal of Psychology, 138(3), 233-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200%2FJRLP.138.3.233-252
  52. Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Thinking styles and teachers' characteristics. International Journal of Psychology, 37(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590143000171

How to Cite

Fauzi, M. N., Hadi, S., & Fatmahanik, U. (2023). The impact of online learning toward social skills of prospective teachers with different thinking styles. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 16(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v16i2.503

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Mohamad Fauzi, Sofwan Hadi, Ulum Fatmahanik

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.